Bankster Crime

Exposing Fraud in the Banking System

Featured Story

Goldman Sachs’ Bank Derivatives Have Grown from $40 Trillion to $54 Trillion in Five Years; So How Did Its Credit Exposure Improve by 200 Percent?

By BanksterCrime:

Derivatives Data for Quarter Ending December 31, 2023

Source: Pam Martens and Russ Martens,

Last Friday, Goldman Sachs Bank USA, the federally-insured, U.S. taxpayer-backstopped commercial bank that the international trading behemoth, Goldman Sachs Group, is allowed to operate, got a smackdown from two of its regulators, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) and the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed).

The two regulators released a letter they had sent to David Solomon, Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs Group, which revealed that the commercial bank had flunked its wind-down test known as its “living will.” Derivatives were specifically cited for the “shortcomings.” Of particular note, the regulators wrote that Goldman Sachs Bank USA “…did not demonstrate the ability to model its derivatives portfolio unwind by counterparty for segmenting the portfolio in resolution. In the [upcoming] 2025 Plan, the Covered Company should demonstrate the ability to view derivatives positions at a counterparty level within both the portfolio unwind and segmentation capabilities.”

The above statement from regulators calls into serious question how Goldman Sachs Bank USA has been able to exponentially expand its derivatives from $40 trillion at the end of 2018 to $54 trillion at the end of last year but somehow reduce its ratio of credit exposure to capital from 354 percent for the quarter ending December 31, 2018 to 142 percent for the quarter ending December 31, 2023. (See charts above using data from the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.)

Since knowing the risk of one’s counterparties is a key component of risk-weighting to determine capital needs, Goldman Sachs should have been able to “model its derivatives portfolio unwind by counterparty.”

The fact that it couldn’t raises more serious questions about regulator capture in the U.S.

For essential background, see our report: The Fed Has a Dirty Little Secret: It’s Been Allowing the Wall Street Mega Banks to Calculate their Own Capital Requirements.

Following the financial crash of 2008, Phil Angelides, the Chair of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (FCIC), stated the following on June 30, 2010 at a hearing convened specifically to examine “The Role of Derivatives in the Financial Crisis”:

“I must say that despite 30 years in housing, finance, and investment — in both the public and private sectors — I had little appreciation of the tremendous leverage, risk, and speculation that was growing in the dark world of derivatives. Neither, apparently, did the captains of finance nor our leaders in Washington.

“The sheer size of the derivatives market is as stunning as its growth. The notional value of over the-counter derivatives grew from $88 trillion in 1999 to $684 trillion in 2008. That’s more than ten times the size of the Gross Domestic Product of all nations. Credit derivatives grew from less than a trillion dollars at the beginning of this decade to a peak of $58 trillion in 2007. These derivatives multiplied throughout our financial markets, unseen and unregulated…

“In June 2008, Goldman’s derivative book had a stunning notional value of $53 trillion.”

Today, after the much touted (but toothless) Dodd-Frank financial reform legislation of 2010, two more financial crises which included bailouts of Goldman Sachs and its peers, the derivatives book at Goldman is $1 trillion more than during the crisis of 2008 – the worst crisis since the Great Depression.

For why Goldman Sachs needs far more heightened scrutiny of its derivatives book than is currently happening, carefully consider the graph below which was released by the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission that investigated the crash of 2008. The three largest counterparties to Goldman Sachs’ credit derivatives — Deutsche Bank, Merrill Lynch, and Morgan Stanley – all had to tap massive bailouts from the Fed.

Source: Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission

Largest Recipients of Federal Reserve Bailout Funds, 2007 to 2011

Loading

Don't Miss

David Webb Has an Incredible Bio, and Came From a Family Deeply Involved in Freemasonry. He Was a Successful Wall Street Manager for Years, and Now Lives in Switzerland Where He Owns Farmland. He Is Originally From Cleveland

By StevieRay Hansen

According to Webb, everything is now in place for the Banks to steal our money in the “Great Reset.” Down Load The Free Book Here…

Read More

It Seems We Have Hit A Point Where A Wall Is In The Way Of “Kicking The Can” Much Further

By StevieRay Hansen

BanksterCrime: by Tyler Durden By Peter Tchir of Academy Securities I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about “kicking the can.” Not because “kicking the…

Read More

The New York Fed Has Extended Its Half Trillion Dollar Bailout Facility to a Sprawling Japanese Bank You’ve Never Heard Of

By StevieRay Hansen

BanksterCrime: By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: Kazuto Oku, CEO of Norinchukin Bank Quietly, on December 1, the New York Fed published the following statement on…

Read More

Wall Street CEOs Want the Line Between a Federally-Insured Bank and a Wall Street Trading Casino Erased; Regulators Want Higher Capital to Prevent That

By StevieRay Hansen

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: David Solomon, Chairman and CEO, Goldman Sachs David Solomon, Chairman and CEO of Goldman Sachs, let it slip out at…

Read More

Fed’s Vice Chair for Supervision Says Another Financial Crisis Could Cost U.S. $5 Trillion to $25 Trillion – Potentially as Much as 100 Percent of GDP–It’s Tribulation In Full View

By StevieRay Hansen

BanksterCrime: By Pam Martens and Russ Martens Michael Barr, Fed Vice Chair for Supervision On Monday, Michael Barr, the Vice Chair for Supervision at the Federal…

Read More

BanksterCrime

LEAVE A RESPONSE

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *