2/23/24: These Charts Reveal Why the Fed Is Frightened about Capital Levels at the Wall Street Mega Banks

Featured Story

Deposits at Large Banks Versus Small Banks, April 13, 2022 through February 7, 2024

By Pam Martens and Russ Martens:

According to Federal Reserve data dating back to July 3, 1985 – a span of close to 39 years – there has not been a time when the largest 25 banks were bleeding deposits on the scale that has been happening for the past 22 months.

There has also never been a time comparable to the last 22 months when the largest 25 banks were bleeding deposits while the smaller banks were growing deposits. (See the chart above.)

To get our minds around today’s situation, we made another chart using Federal Reserve data dating back to 1998 – the year before the Glass-Steagall Act was repealed. It shows that the ratio of deposits of the 25 largest banks to the smaller banks stood at 3 times in 1998 and has shrunk to its lowest level of 2.03 times as of February 7 of this year.


We really appreciate your help. Maintaining the websites and live streaming videos requires a substantial financial commitment. Any amount contribution is much appreciated. Please think about contributing a reasonable amount on a monthly basis.

Please Give Please Give You can also send a check to PO Box 127, Pontotoc, TX 76869.

The HIMEDIA Group. Join the cause. Donate now.


Ratio of Large Bank Deposits to Small Bank Deposits Since 1998

That ratio has shrunk even though the Fed has allowed big banks to gobble up smaller banks at a mind-boggling rate. (See our report: In 16 Years, the Fed Has Approved 4,506 Bank Mergers and Denied One.)

The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1999 allowed the giant trading houses on Wall Street to merge with giant, federally-insured, taxpayer backstopped commercial banks, creating the Frakenbanks that blew themselves up in 2008, taking the U.S. economy on the worst ride since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

To give you an idea of how radically the Fed’s thinking on its emergency lending facilities has changed since the financial crisis of the 1930s, during the Great Depression the Fed made just 123 emergency loans totaling $1.5 million – approximately $33.77 million in today’s dollars.

During the 2007 to 2010 financial crisis, the Fed made more than $16 trillion (yes, trillion) in emergency cumulative loans to the casino banks on Wall Street, as well as to foreign banks that were Wall Street’s derivative counterparties, as well as to mega bank trading subsidiaries in London. Then the Fed battled the media in court for years to prevent that $16 trillion figure from becoming public. (See chart below from the Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) audit of the Fed’s emergency lending facilities from 2007 to 2010.) Just one Frankenbank at the time, Citigroup, received $2.5 trillion in secret cumulative loans from the Fed.

To put this in sharper perspective, $16 trillion is 474,777 times the amount of money the Fed loaned during the Great Depression, using the $33.77 million adjusted figure. Does that mean that the Wall Street mega banks are 475,000 times more dangerous today than they were in the 1930s?

It might very well mean that, for this reason: From the passage of the Glass-Steagall Act in 1933 to its repeal in 1999 under the Wall Street-cozy Bill Clinton administration, there were no major threats to the U.S. banking system that required the need for emergency lending by the Fed under Section 13(3) of the Federal Reserve Act. But just 9 years after the repeal of Glass-Steagall, the Fed went on a wild emergency lending spree and century-old iconic banks on Wall Street blew up.

Ever since the 2007-2010 financial crisis, the Fed has been finding ever more creative ways to funnel trillions of dollars in cheap money into the Wall Street casino banks. In just the past four years, the Fed has created three separate bailout operations: the 2019 repo loan bailouts; the 2020 bailouts in response to the COVID-19 pandemic; and the spring of 2023 Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) bailouts when the second, third and fourth largest bank failures in U.S. history occurred. (See our report: Former New York Fed Pres Bill Dudley Calls This the First Banking Crisis Since 2008; Charts Show It’s the Third.)

If you agree with us that the current banking structure in the U.S. represents a threat to national security and economic stability, please contact your U.S. Senators today via the U.S. Capitol switchboard by dialing (202) 224-3121. Tell your Senators to hold immediate hearings on the Fed’s non-stop bailouts and demand the restoration of the Glass-Steagall Act.

GAO Data on Fed’s Emergency Lending Programs During 2007-2010 Financial Crisis.


Treat your skin well. Our soaps are gentle and produce a smooth, creamy lather that is nourishing to your skin. They are handmade in small batches. We use only high-quality natural ingredients. No chemicals, no sodium laurel sulfate, no phthalates, no parabens, no detergents. GraniteRidgeSoapworks

Loading

Don't Miss

Second ex Barclays banker convicted in London Euribor re-trial

By StevieRay Hansen

It is the love of money, and not money itself, that is the problem. The love of money is a sin because it gets in…

Loading

Read More

Michael Avenatti fraud case shines a light on bankers, lawyers and money in Biloxi

By StevieRay Hansen

Why is the love of money a root of all kinds of evil? To help us answer this, we must look at the passage in…

Loading

Read More

Wells Fargo is the smallest of the four giants that now dominate the U.S. commercial banking business

By StevieRay Hansen

But it has surpassed its larger counterparts in the extent to which it has been embroiled in a series of scandals involving reckless lending practices…

Loading

Read More
Posted in

StevieRay Hansen

In his riveting memoir, "A Long Journey Home", StevieRay Hansen will lead you through his incredible journey from homeless kid to multimillionaire oilman willing to give a helping hand to other throwaway kids. Available on Amazon.

Leave a Comment